Freedom and necessity in modern Trinitarian theology / Brandon Gallaher.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Oxford theology and religion monographsEdition: First editionDescription: 1 online resource (xix, 298 pages)Subject(s): Genre/Form: DDC classification:
  • 231.044 23
LOC classification:
  • BT111.3 .G35 2016
Online resources:
Contents:
Foreword / Rowan Williams -- Freedom and necessity as trinitarian mystery and 'problematic' -- Divine freedom--a dialectical approach: from freedom to necessity--the shape of a 'problematic' (A) -- Divine freedom--a dialectical approach: from necessity to freedom--the shape of a 'problematic' (B) -- 'Sophiological antinomism'--Sergii Bulgakov's debt to and critique of Vladimir Solov'ev -- God as absolute and absolute-relative in Bulgakov: theological antinomy in the doctrine of God -- Divine freedom and the need of God for creation -- Trinity and the doctrine of election in Karl Barth -- Trinity, freedom, and necessity in Karl Barth--a dialectical approach -- The metaphysics of love--four steps -- The Trinity, creation, and freedom--more on the fourth step -- Christ, creation, and divine possiblities--'sheltered within' the Trinity -- Concluding unsystematic systematic postscript.
Summary: "Examines the tension between God and the world through a constructive reading of the Trinitarian theologies and Christologies of Sergii Bulgakov (1871-1944), Karl Barth (1886-1968), and Hans Urs von Balthasar (1905-1988). It focuses on what is called "the problematic of divine freedom and necessity" and the response of the writers. "Problematic" refers to God being simultaneously radically free and utterly bound to creation. God did not need to create and redeem the world in Christ. It is a contingent free gift. Yet, on the other side of a dialectic, he also has eternally determined himself to be God as Jesus Christ. He must create and redeem the world to be God as he has so determined. In this way the world is given a certain "free necessity" by him because if there were no world then there would be no Christ. A spectrum of different concepts of freedom and necessity and a theological ideal of a balance between the same are outlined and then used to illumine the writers and to articulate a constructive response to the problematic. Brandon Gallaher shows that the classical Christian understanding of God having a non-necessary relationship to the world and divine freedom being a sheer assertion of God's will must be completely rethought. Gallaher proposes a Trinitarian, Christocentric, and cruciform vision of divine freedom. God is free as eternally self-giving, self-emptying and self-receiving love. The work concludes with a contemporary theology of divine freedom founded on divine election"--
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 251-286) and index.

Foreword / Rowan Williams -- Freedom and necessity as trinitarian mystery and 'problematic' -- Divine freedom--a dialectical approach: from freedom to necessity--the shape of a 'problematic' (A) -- Divine freedom--a dialectical approach: from necessity to freedom--the shape of a 'problematic' (B) -- 'Sophiological antinomism'--Sergii Bulgakov's debt to and critique of Vladimir Solov'ev -- God as absolute and absolute-relative in Bulgakov: theological antinomy in the doctrine of God -- Divine freedom and the need of God for creation -- Trinity and the doctrine of election in Karl Barth -- Trinity, freedom, and necessity in Karl Barth--a dialectical approach -- The metaphysics of love--four steps -- The Trinity, creation, and freedom--more on the fourth step -- Christ, creation, and divine possiblities--'sheltered within' the Trinity -- Concluding unsystematic systematic postscript.

Off-campus access available to licensed patron groups.

"Examines the tension between God and the world through a constructive reading of the Trinitarian theologies and Christologies of Sergii Bulgakov (1871-1944), Karl Barth (1886-1968), and Hans Urs von Balthasar (1905-1988). It focuses on what is called "the problematic of divine freedom and necessity" and the response of the writers. "Problematic" refers to God being simultaneously radically free and utterly bound to creation. God did not need to create and redeem the world in Christ. It is a contingent free gift. Yet, on the other side of a dialectic, he also has eternally determined himself to be God as Jesus Christ. He must create and redeem the world to be God as he has so determined. In this way the world is given a certain "free necessity" by him because if there were no world then there would be no Christ. A spectrum of different concepts of freedom and necessity and a theological ideal of a balance between the same are outlined and then used to illumine the writers and to articulate a constructive response to the problematic. Brandon Gallaher shows that the classical Christian understanding of God having a non-necessary relationship to the world and divine freedom being a sheer assertion of God's will must be completely rethought. Gallaher proposes a Trinitarian, Christocentric, and cruciform vision of divine freedom. God is free as eternally self-giving, self-emptying and self-receiving love. The work concludes with a contemporary theology of divine freedom founded on divine election"--

Share