Ethics and the beast [electronic resource] : an speciesist argument for animal liberationism / Tzachi Zamir.
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d854d/d854d365a56b0c6f5e68aa95ef89518931cbaa79" alt="Text"
- 9781400828135 (electronic bk.)
- 1400828139 (electronic bk.)
- Speciesist argument for animal liberationism
- 179/.3 22
- HV4708 .Z36 2007eb
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Reformational Study Centre General library | 179.3 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Browsing Reformational Study Centre shelves, Shelving location: General library Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
179.3 Animal rights | 179.3 In defense of animals : the second wave / | 179.3 Animal rights / | 179.3 Ethics and the beast | 179.3 Animal ethics and philosophy | 179.3 Companion animal ethics | 179.3 The Routledge handbook of animal ethics / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Ethics and beasts -- Is speciesism opposed to liberationism? -- Why animals matter -- Killing -- Killing for pleasure -- Killing for knowledge -- Using -- Use or exploitation? -- Culinary use -- Therapeutic use -- Recreational use.
Many people think that animal liberation would require a fundamental transformation of basic beliefs. We would have to give up "speciesism" and start viewing animals as our equals, with rights and moral status. And we would have to apply these beliefs in an all-or-nothing way. But in Ethics and the Beast, Tzachi Zamir makes the radical argument that animal liberation doesn't require such radical arguments--and that liberation could be accomplished in a flexible and pragmatic way. By making a case for liberation that is based primarily on common moral intuitions and beliefs, and that therefore.